REGIONAL FEATURES OF BIRTH AND TERMINATION OF RUSSIAN ENTERPRISES IN 2020

  • Pinkovetskaia Iu.S. Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, Russia

Abstract

The development of the Russian economy is associated with an increase in the number of actually functioning enterprises. The aim of the study was to assess the indicators reflecting the specific weights of the number of births and termination of activities in the total number of active enterprises in 2020, as well as the ratio of these indicators by regions of Russia. The study was based on official statistics on the number of active, born and terminated enterprises in Russia. In the course of the research, the following relative indicators were studied: the share of newly born enterprises in the total number of active enterprises; the proportion of enterprises that have ceased operations in the total number of active enterprises; the ratio of the number of born and terminated enterprises. The assessment of these indicators was carried out for all regions of the country; their average values ​​and intervals of change, typical for most regions, have been determined; the regions with the maximum and minimum levels of indicators have been identified. The main results of the study are as follows: it is shown that the average value of the ratio of the number of born and terminated enterprises by regions of Russia in 2020 was 0.49; it was proved that in the absolute majority of regions the number of enterprises that ceased operations exceeded the number of newly born enterprises; the average for the regions was determined for the specific weights of enterprises born and ceased operations, which amounted to 6.46 and 13.87, respectively, of the total number of active enterprises. The proposed methodological approach and tools can be used in scientific research on the demography of enterprises, namely, when monitoring the proportion of enterprises born and stopped operating in the regions of Russia. The results of the work can be applied in the current activities of government agencies and public organizations when justifying measures to significantly increase the number of new enterprises based on the support of people who wish to create their own business. In addition, it is essential to help enterprises that are at the stage of extinction in order to get them out of the crisis state. Further research can be carried out to assess the industry characteristics characteristic of these types of enterprises.

Keywords

business demography, defunct enterprises, regions, emerging enterprises, normal distribution functions

References

Somov V.L., and Tolmachev M.N. Statisticheskiy analiz sovremennykh tendentsiy biznes-demografii [Statistical analysis of modern trends in business demography] / Aktual'nyye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya gosudarstvennoy statistiki v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Actual problems and prospects for the development of state statistics in modern conditions]: materials of the ISPC: in 2 volumes, Saratov, January 20-22, 2020. Saratovstat, Saratov Socio-Economic Institute (branch) of the FSBEI of HE PRUE G.V. Plekhanov. 2020. Pp. 143-146. (In Russ.).

Polozhentseva Y.S., and Androsova I.V. Prospects for the development of business demography of economic subjects // CITISE. 2019. Vol. 4(21). Pp. 136-145. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2019.4.15

Business demographics (2021). Federal State Statistics Service. (In Russ.). URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/33PW8E90/bush-dem4.html (accessed on 06.02.2021).

SibirskayaE.V., Oveshnikova L.V., and Makhova O.A. Statistical analysis of entrepreneurial activity // Voprosy statistiki. 2018. Vol. 25(10). Pp. 47-60. (In Russ.).

Eisenmann T.R. Determinants of Early-Stage Startup Performance: Survey Results. Working paper 21-057. Harvard business school. 2021. 65 p.

Azoulay P., Jones B.F., Kim J.D., and Miranda J. Age and high-growth entrepreneurship // American Economic Review: Insights. 2020. Vol. 2(1). Рp. 65-82. DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20180582

Bocken N., and Snihur Yu. Lean startup and the business model: Experimenting for novelty and impact // Long Range Planning. 2020. Vol. 53(4). Рp. 1-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101953

Wasserman N. The throne vs. the kingdom: Founder control and value creation in startups // Strategic Management Journal. 2017. Vol. 38(2). Рp. 255-277.

Balcaen S., Manigart S., Buyze J., and Ooghe H. Firm Exit after Distress: Differentiating between Bankruptcy, Voluntary Liquidation and M&A // Small Business Economics. 2011. Vol. 39(4). Рp. 949-975. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9342-7

Kücher A., Mayr S., Mitter C., Duller C., and Feldbauer-Durstmüller B. Firm age dynamics and causes of corporate bankruptcy: age dependent explanations for business failure // Review of Managerial Science. 2020. Vol. 14. Pp. 633-661. DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11846-018-0303-2

Karabag S.F. Factors impacting firm failure and technological development: A study of three emerging-economy firms // Journal of Business Research. 2018. Vol. 98(C). Рp. 462-474. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.008

Vysotskaya T.R. Prospects for entrepreneurship in Russia: problems and support // Innovatsionnoye razvitiye nauki i obrazovaniya [Innovative development of science and education]. 2018. Vol. 15. Pp. 191-199. (In Russ.).

Zaporozhtseva L.A. Ratio of the theory of cycles and regularities of economically safe development of the enterprise in modern conditions of managing // Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes. 2014. Vol. 9(9). Pp. 42-55. (In Russ.).

Kolmakov V.V. The dynamics of enterprises quantity in terms of the Russian business climate transformation / EUROPEAN RESEARCH: materials of V ISPC, Penza, October 7, 2016. Penza: Publisher “Nauka i Prosveshcheniye”. 2016. Pp. 53-57. (In Russ.).

Miroshnikova T.K. Trends of small and medium-sized businesses development in the region: problems and prospects // Azimuth of scientific research: economics and administration. 2018. Vol. 7(3-24). Pp. 202-205. (In Russ.).

Pinkovetskaia I., and Slepova V. Estimation of Fixed Capital Investment in SMEs: the Existing Differentiation in the Russian Federation // Business Systems Research. 2018. Vol. 9(1). Рp. 65-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2018-0006

About the Author

Iuliia S. Pinkovetskaia – PhD in Economics, Docent; Associate Professor, Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, Russia. E-mail: judy54@yandex.ru. SPIN РИНЦ 5784-7881. ORCID 0000-0002-8224-9031

For citation

Pinkovetskaia Iu.S. Regional Features of Birth and Termination of Russian Enterprises in 2020 // BENEFICIUM. 2021. Vol. 2(39). Pp. 70-75. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34680/BENEFICIUM.2021.2(39).70-75

Published
2021-08-01
Section
DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS STRUCTURES